The excitement surrounding the Rebbe’s victory of the seforim (5 Teives, 5747) is so intense that it begins even while we are still celebrating Chanukah. The day which the Rebbe referred to as “our side wins” (“Didan Notzach”) is a powerful dor hashvi’i celebration that rightly sweeps through Lubavitch. But beyond the farbrengens and the purchasing of seforim, the events of Didan Notzach and the sichos surrounding it deserve proper attention in order to understand at least something of the true magnitude of the victory. In particular, to recognize how 5 Teives represents the culmination in this physical world of the battle that has been going on since the times of the Alter Rebbe — the battle to bring the Geuloh.
The War of the Alter Rebbe
Hey Teives arrives a few days after the end of the month of Kislev, when everyone is still saturated with the story of the kitrug against the Alter Rebbe and against spreading Chassidus, concluding in the miraculous geuloh of 19 Kislev. It is also only a few weeks before 24 Teives, the histalkus of the Alter Rebbe, which occurred during his 140-day flight from Napoleon.
The Alter Rebbe’s opposition to Napoleon is well known. The Rebbe, in the sicha of Vayeishev 5752, characterizes the French Revolution under Napoleon primarily by its attribute of “prikas ‘ol“: overthrowing the leadership of the King and Queen, and “bringing a spirit of liberation, r”l, from all matters of religion and faith” (along the lines of the klipah of Sancheriv). In contrast, the rulership of the Czars of Russia was characterized by strong-handed royalty and the firm establishment of faith in a Divine power.1
The Alter Rebbe’s flight from the rule of Napoleon indicates that in his day this klipah was at its strongest, and attempting to refine it was, apparently, not an option. But it’s time would come, as we learn from the following incident, which the Rebbe brings in the above-mentioned sicha (footnote 52):
…the Alter Rebbe requested that they let him know the melody of the “march” with which the French crossed the Russian border. When they sang the niggun for him he sighed and said that this is a niggun of victory, and he concluded — after some long moments of “dveikus” — in the end the victory will be ours! (סוף כל סוף יהי’ דידן נצח)
From here we see that a Didan Notzach has been waiting to occur since the flight of the Alter Rebbe from Napoleon. Not only that, but this particular Didan Notzach is a matter of “in the end” סוף כל סוף — a matter pertaining to Geuloh.
The Nation of France, the Klipah of Napoleon
This “niggun of victory” (known to us as Napoleon’s March) has been sung by Chassidim for at least several generations, but this was never declared a Didan Notzach over the klipa of France nor Napoleon2. In the sicha of Vayeishev, 5752, the Rebbe describes that in fact there were stages in the refinement and “conquering” of France: visits by Rabboseinu Nessienu, the saying of Chassidus, the sending of the Rebbe and the Rebbetzin to live there for 8 years, the establishment of Tomchei Temimim and numerous shluchim. Then, on Simchas Torah 5734, there was a major transformation: in the presence of Jewish guests from France, the Rebbe began singing the melody of the French national anthem (“The Marseillais“) with the words of “Ho’aderes v’ho’Emunah“, bringing it into the realm of kedusha (as the Rebbe explains). However, none of this was associated with a Didan Notzach. Important stages, perhaps, but the not the ultimate victory.
At this point we can suggest that while the Alter Rebbe prevented the klipah of France (and Napoleon) from conquering Russia, this was only temporary — a little over 100 years later (at the end of the Rebbe Rashab’s nesius) the klipah would in fact succeed in conquering Russia — what is called the Communist Revolution. It succeeded in bringing about Napoleon’s goals: destruction of the Russian monarchy and a opposition to all matters of religion and faith, r”l). During the very same years that the klipah of France was undergoing refinement, the situation of Jews in Soviet Russia (under the klipah of Sancheriv/Napoleon, the outright war against belief in the Creator) was at its worst. Not only Jews, but in fact the whole world was endangered by the threat of a nuclear conflict between the USSR and the United States3. Then, something amazing took place: the long-awaited Didan Notzach.
The Didan Notzach and the End
In Shevat-Adar, 5745, the thefts from the library of Agudas Chassidei Chabad were first noticed. A month later, in Russia, the aging and sick Soviet Premier died, and was replaced by Mikhael Gorbachev. The court case regarding the ownership of the seforim in Federal District Court began in Kislev, 5746 and the ruling was brought down by the Federal Court judge4 on the now-famous day of 5 Teives, 5747. Two weeks after the Didan Notzach of the seforim, Premier Gorbachev began the steps that would lead to the dissolution of the Soviet Union.5 Five years later, December 12, 1991, the Soviet Union effectively ceased to exist, which by Divine Providence was 5 Teives, 5752!6
Indeed, this is exactly what the Alter Rebbe said: “at the very end” (סוף כל סוף) there will be Didan Notzach. In fact, following the Didan Notzach of 5 Teives, 5747 and the fall of the Soviet Union in the ensuing years (5749-5752), the Rebbe began to speak in new terms: “the buttons have been polished”, swords are being converted to plowshares, the work of refining the world — including France — is finished and thus the entire world is ready for Moshiach.
Perhaps most significant is the Rebbe’s repeated referral to the fact that “all the end times have passed” (כלו כל הקיצין), which gives us the basis to recognize in the words of the Alter Rebbe (“at the very end [literally: “the end of all ends”] there will be Didan Notzach“) and the connection to the events of our generation:
- “Didan Notzach” — The victory of the seforim on 5 Teives;
- The defeat of the klipah of Napoleon/Sancheriv that opposed all matters of religion and faith — the fall of Communism; and
- “The very end” — the end of golus, as the expression the “end of all ends” (סוף כל סוף) recalls the Rebbe’s repeated announcement that “all the end times have passed” (כלו כל הקיצין).
The war to bring Moshiach began with the Alter Rebbe’s efforts to fulfill the words the Baal Shem Tov heard from Moshiach: that Moshiach will come “when your wellsprings spread outwards”. The klipah of France (and Napoleon) were bitter obstacles to bringing the Geuloh, requiring 175 years of refinement and mesirus nefesh. But in our days the klipah was defeated, and even transformed. Thus, we stand at the end of Golus7, when there are no more wars left to fight — except, perhaps, the war against our own timidity. This timidity (our personal golus) hinders us from seeing, hearing and understanding what the Rebbe is saying: that the Geuloh is here and we need only to reveal it, with the direct path being the learning of the subjects of Moshiach and Geuloh and accepting the leadership of Moshiach Tzidkeinu!
יחי אדוננו מורנו ורבינו מלך המשיח לעולם ועד
1) This recalls the statement of the Baal Shem Tov that there is more hope for rectifying a gentile who worships idols than for those who completely deny G-d. (Kesser Shem Tov, Hosafos, 163). שיותר יש תיקון לגוי עובד עבודה זרה מן האפיקורסים.
2) In ois 5 of the sicha, it seems that the Rebbe is implying that there are two distinct aspects to the klipah: “this klipah of the kingdom of France (and Napoleon)…was not a only a temporary matter, etc., but rather something which pertains to all times and the generations after that.”
וקליפה זו של מלכות צרפת (ונפוליון)…לא היתה רק ענין זמני כו’, אלא הדבר נוגע לכל הזמנים והדורות שלאחרי זה.
When describing France alone, the Rebbe says that “the situation in France was not so amenable to Yiras Shomayim, etc.”, which is a much softer description than when also mentioning Napoleon: “the hardcore of the klipah and harsh judgement…eliminating [belief in Divine] Providence and belief and trust in G-d (in the manner of Sancheriv).” Additionally, see the sicha of Vayechi, 5752 (footnote 104) which speaks of Sancheriv being defeated by “iron”, meaning, stiff-necked resistance, which suits the fall of Communism. The klipah of France was refined without collapsing, whereas the Soviet Union and Communism were defeated to the point of collapse. The Rebbe emphasizes there the connection of the defeat of Sancheriv to the appointment of Moshiach.
3) The Rebbe addressed a Yechidus klolis on 13 Shevat, 5744, saying that the world was in a very dangerous situation (“שהעולם כולו נמצא במצב של סכנה איומה” — Hisvaaduyos, p. 894). A month after the Rebbe said this, the Soviet Premier Yuri Andropov died, replaced by Konstantin Chernenko who held the position for about a year until his death, and was replaced by Mikhael Gorbachev, as will be mentioned.
4) We can ask: if we are speaking about a Didan Notzach over the klipah of Napoleon, why did the Didan Notzach happen in US Federal Court? Perhaps there is room to speculate: The Rebbe is quoted as saying that the entire case was really about the Rebbe’s nesius, which means a battle to, ch’v ch’v, depose the King who himself embodies and empowers belief in Hashem — both of Napoleon’s goals in one.
Since Napoleon is compared to the klipah of Sancheriv, then let us note that Sancheriv’s desire was to conquer Yerushalayim. He besieged the Holy City, but wasn’t able even to enter before Hashem sent the miraculous salvation. Napoleon Bonaparte also attempted (and failed) to conquer Eretz Yisroel 13 years prior to invading Russia (when he ferociously pursued the Alter Rebbe). In 5687 (1927) this klipah (in it’s Soviet incarnation) attempted to ch’v ch’v eliminate the leader of Chassidus and Yiddishkeit, but nonetheless it did not challenge the fact that the Frierdicker Rebbe was in fact the leader.
In the events of the seforim case in 5745-47, the klipah came as closer than ever: acting through a grandson from the royal family, actually entering 770 (“Yerushalayim” in the time of golus), taking seforim (“the life”) of Nosi Doreinu — in order to bring about a challenge to the Rebbe’s leadership itself! Being that Lubavitch is now located in the United States, the legal (and spiritual) victory of the Rebbe’s leadership was declared– “in the eyes of all the nations” — by the US Federal court (the most distinguished branch of the US legal system, more so than the state court systems).
(Perhaps it is noteworthy that the United States was established after a revolution that took place only a few years before the French revolution. In both cases they were based on principles of democracy and freedom and replacing the rule of the King with the role of the People — except for the decisive difference that in the case of the United States it was founded on belief in G-d and not the opposite, as in the case of France (and the Soviet Union). The ruling that there is a Rebbe came from the Federal Court of the country founded on the same principles, but with acknowledgement of the Supreme power.)
We should point out that the Rebbe says that what brought down the Soviet Union was imprisonment and miraculous release of the Frierdicker Rebbe in 5687 (on 12-13 Tammuz), even though it took 60 years to occur. (Sicha, Shabbos parshas Korach, 5751)
5) “At the January 28–30, 1987, Central Committee plenum, Gorbachev suggested a new policy of demokratizatsiya throughout Soviet society. He proposed that future Communist Party elections should offer a choice between multiple candidates, elected by secret ballot…. Gorbachev also radically expanded the scope of Glasnost, stating that no subject was off-limits for open discussion in the media. On February 7, 1987, dozens of political prisoners were freed…” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Soviet_Union).
6) The Belovezha Accords were signed by Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia in December, 1991, “effectively declaring the demise of the Soviet Union”. The final ratification, by the Russian Federation, took place on December 12, which was 5 Teives! It was mentioned by the Rebbe in the Sicha the following Shabbos, that “that country” had very recently “transferred the capitol to another state”, which the Rebbe identifies as the fall of Russia.
7) Note that the Rebbe likens the klipah of France (and Napoleon) to the klipa of Sancheriv.
ה”גאות והתנשאות לתלות ולסמוך על כוחו וגבורתו כו’ לומר כוחי ועוצם ידי ומסלק ההשגחה ואמונה ובטחון באלקים כו’” (בדוגמת קליפת סנחריב).
Our sages tell us (Sanhedrin 94a) that the Holy One wanted to make Hezkiyahu Moshiach and Sancheriv Gog uMagog — a further hint that overcoming the klipah of France (and Napoleon) is related to the Geuloh. Thus, it is not surprising that the Rebbe concludes the sicha of Vayeishev, 5752, by emphasizing the need to thank Hashem and publicize the miracles because it was due to failure to thank Hashem that the attribute of Justice opposed making Hezkiyahu Moshiach.*
* And the gemara (Rabbi Tanchum in the name of Bar Kappara) brings this discussion in answer to the question why in the prophecy of Yeshaya (9:6) the word לםרבה is uncharacteristically written with a final Mem (closed on all 4 sides) in the middle of the word? The answer: the attribute of Justice “closed” this letter Mem in his opposition to making Hezkiyahu Moshiach. The Rebbe notes that Tzarfas (France) is the same letters as the word “Ufaratzta” (spreading out in all directions) — the exact opposite of the closed Mem.